Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Getting up and getting on with it :)

Hey world *waves*

Blogging's on hold a bit over the festive season (both here and on Thoughtful Eclecticism), but I thought I'd jot down a few lines to say what I've been up to ...

I'm feeling like I'm beginning to be properly organised again, which is a nice feeling. Not that I was particularly disorganised, but at times over the past term it's felt like everything was just too much and getting on top of me (like here), and I'm feeling a bit more in control now.

I'm also more able to get up in the mornings. I feel like I've had 6 months of treating myself relatively softly (i.e. not pushing myself too much) since graduating, and now I know what I'm doing (in terms of work / study / church / youth / dance), I can start to gauge where and when to push, and start being a bit more active and a bit less passive. (People who know me will probably think that I haven't been at all passive over the last 6 months ... but it's all relative!). I feel like I'm waking up a bit more and reevaluating what I can really do (and what I should drop) a bit more and things like that ...

At the moment I feel good because:
  • I'm making progress on my essay every day
  • I'm moving forward with student christian organisingy stuff every day
  • I've posted the globes to Jenny (see previous post)
  • I've been doing other useful things that needed doing (like laundry)
  • I've been in lots of contact with Hazel, in ways that will (hopefully!) help with her work
  • I've been spending lots of time with family
  • I'm getting up and out of the house in the mornings (almost all of what I need to do needs to happen inside, but getting out to go to the post office or whatever seems to reset my brain to realise that the day has really started and I can be productive now).
It's a nice feeling :) and it's even nicer that I'm starting to take hold of myself again and not take "but I don't feel like it right now ..." as a blanket reason not to do something. 

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

se-law precedent shows that marks consisting of various colors and combinations of colors have been held to be protectable in the fashion industry. True, says the Amerikat, but not a single color on fashion item .TheLouboutin Shoes Utilitarian Functionality DefenseAfter examining the validity, the court should have looked at the likelihood of confusion. Despite both parties providing arguments on this point, Jud

ople"; a people drifting towards an internecine conflict due to the actions of a regime which she loyally serves.Yet the one woman who managed to cultivate a smokescreen for the reality in Syria is President Assad's wife, Asma. A British-educated girl from west London, with a degree in computer science and a career in financial services, Asma was key asset for the regime.Christian Louboutin SlingbacksShe and Bashar were the t

ould spend thousands of pounds on a Valentino leather jacket, when they can easily buy a similar leather jacket from Topshop or Zara for ?ê100. These people are right, but for this article, I asked a friend of mine why she bought a trademark Alexander McQueen scarf with skulls on it, when there are fake versions everywhere."Alexander McQueen was a prodigy, he created that idea of the scarves and h

packages its jewelry items in distinctive robin's-egg blue boxes, weighed in on Louboutin's behalf. In its filing, Tiffany noted that it has a registered trademark for its "Tiffany blue" color.The company argues that theChristian Louboutin Flats lower court holding that a single color for a fashion item can never be a valid trademark "is not supported" by trademark law. Serta Restokraft Mattress Co Inc.'s Serta unit aske